37 ὁ δὲ εἶπεν, ὁ ποιήσας τὸ ἔλεος μετ' αὐτοῦ. εἶπεν δὲ αὐτῷ ὁ ἰησοῦς, πορεύου καὶ σὺ ποίει ὁμοίως.
38 ἐν δὲ τῷ πορεύεσθαι αὐτοὺς αὐτὸς εἰσῆλθεν εἰς κώμην τινά: γυνὴ δέ τις ὀνόματι μάρθα ὑπεδέξατο αὐτόν.
39 καὶ τῇδε ἦν ἀδελφὴ καλουμένη μαριάμ, [ἣ] καὶ παρακαθεσθεῖσα πρὸς τοὺς πόδας τοῦ κυρίου ἤκουεν τὸν λόγον αὐτοῦ.
40 ἡ δὲ μάρθα περιεσπᾶτο περὶ πολλὴν διακονίαν: ἐπιστᾶσα δὲ εἶπεν, κύριε, οὐ μέλει σοι ὅτι ἡ ἀδελφή μου μόνην με κατέλιπεν διακονεῖν; εἰπὲ οὖν αὐτῇ ἵνα μοι συναντιλάβηται.
41 ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ εἶπεν αὐτῇ ὁ κύριος, μάρθα μάρθα, μεριμνᾷς καὶ θορυβάζῃ περὶ πολλά,
42 ἑνὸς δέ ἐστιν χρεία: μαριὰμ γὰρ τὴν ἀγαθὴν μερίδα ἐξελέξατο ἥτις οὐκ ἀφαιρεθήσεται αὐτῆς.
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall Deacons. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall Deacons. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Κυριακή 17 Απριλίου 2011

Animal Sacrifices and Eucharistic Sacrifice (Saint Fulgentius)

Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall 

Link to Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall


Animal Sacrifices and Eucharistic Sacrifice (Saint Fulgentius)
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 09:13 AM PDT
Moses ordaining Aaron as High Priest of All Israel

Perhaps the least understood element of in true Old Testament Judaism (as practiced by Moses) is the liturgical offering of animal sacrifice. Blood sacrifice was the central element of the precepts Moses because it was instituted in anticipation of the Cross of Christ. 

All the Apostles and Church Fathers stress that animal blood sacrifice was a preparation for the bloody sacrifice of Christ on the altar of the holy cross. Moreover, the sacrifice endures through time through the unbloody sacrifice of the Holy Mass, so that Holy Sacrifice of the Cross and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass are one and the same. So when Catholic priests today enter the sanctuary and kiss the altar, they kiss the cross of Christ. Incidentally, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI has asked that a crucifix be always placed on the altar so as to better signify this mystery to the priest and to the people. We must be ever mindful that the altar is the locus of sacrifice. The sacrificial blood of Christ is the means by which we are made children of God the Father, brethren of Christ the King, deified partakers of the Holy Spirit and sanctifying grace, justified sinners, and eventually saints prepared for heaven.

Saint Fulgentius gives us a clear and beautiful explanation of animal sacrifice and how it is fulfilled by Christ:
The sacrifices of animal victims which our forefathers were commanded to offer to God by the holy Trinity itself, the one God of the old and the new testaments, foreshadowed the most acceptable gift of all. This was the offering which in his compassion the only Son of God would make of himself in his human nature for our sake.
The Apostle teaches that Christ offered himself for us to God as a fragrant offering and sacrifice. He is the true God and the true high priest who for our sake entered once for all into the holy of holies, taking with him not the blood of bulls and goats but his own blood. This was foreshadowed by the high priest of old when each year he took blood and entered the holy of holies.
Christ is therefore the one who in himself alone embodied all that he knew to be necessary to achieve our redemption. He is at once priest and sacrifice, God and temple. He is the priest through whom we have been reconciled, the sacrifice by which we have been reconciled, the temple in which we have been reconciled, the God with whom we have been reconciled. He alone is priest, sacrifice and temple because he is all these things as God in the form of a servant; but he is not alone as God, for he is this with the Father and the Holy Spirit in the form of God.
Hold fast to this and never doubt it: the only-begotten Son, God the Word, becoming man offered himself for us to God as a fragrant offering and sacrifice. In the time of the old testament, patriarchs, prophets and priests sacrificed animals in his honour, and in honour of the Father and the Holy Spirit as well.
Now in the time of the new testament the holy catholic Church throughout the world never ceases to offer the sacrifice of bread and wine, in faith and love, to him and to the Father and the Holy Spirit, with whom he shares one godhead.
Those animal sacrifices foreshadowed the flesh of Christ which he would offer for our sins, though himself without sin, and the blood which he would pour out for the forgiveness of our sins. In this sacrifice there is thanksgiving for, and commemoration of, the flesh of Christ that he offered for us, and the blood that the same God poured out for us. On this Saint Paul says in the Acts of the Apostles: Keep watch over yourselves and over the whole flock, in which the Holy Spirit has appointed you as bishops to rule the Church of God, which he won for himself by his blood.
Those sacrifices of old pointed in sign to what was to be given to us. In this sacrifice we see plainly what has already been given to us. Those sacrifices foretold the death of the Son of God for sinners. In this sacrifice he is proclaimed as already slain for sinners, as the Apostle testifies: Christ died for the wicked at a time when we were still powerless, and when we were enemies we were reconciled with God through the death of his Son.

- Saint Fulgentius, De fide ad Petrum, Cap. 22. 62 (CCL 91 A, 726. 750-751)
We see, then, that the Old Testament reveals a religion that is not modern day Rabbinic Judaism (rabbis and synagogues without blood sacrifice), but rather a religion that we might call Mosaic Judaism (priests and temple, centered on blood sacrifice). This is why I often say that the one religion on earth that most closely resembles and therefore fulfills the religion of Moses, is not contemporary Judaism, but rather Catholic Christianity. If Moses visited a modern-day synagogue, he would not find it familiar. Moses prescribed blood sacrifice, priesthood, vestments, and a tabernacle - not merely rabbis, cantors, and homilies. In fact, Moses would discover Catholicism to be the fulfillment of everything that he prescribed. The Holy Eucharist, as source and summit, fulfills all the hopes of Moses.

Τρίτη 5 Απριλίου 2011

The Breasts of Jerusalem: Laetare Sunday (4th Sunday in Lent)

Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall

Link to Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall


The Breasts of Jerusalem: Laetare Sunday (4th Sunday in Lent)
Posted: 03 Apr 2011 06:50 PM PDT
The fourth Sunday in Lent marks the middle of Lent, and is commonly called "Laetare Sunday" from the traditional Latin Introit: "Laetare, Jerusalem; et conventum facite omnes, qui diligitis eam: gaudete cum laetitia, qui in tristitia fuistis: at exsultetis et satiemini ab uberibus consolationis vestrae. Laetatus sum in his quae dicta sunt mihi: in domum Domini ibimus," which translates:

"Rejoice Jerusalem, and meet together all you who love her; rejoice exceedingly, you who have been in sorrow, that you may leap for joy, and be satiated with comfort from her breasts. Ps. I rejoiced at the things that were said to me: we shall go into the house of the Lord."

The Introit recalls Zechariah 2:10 and Isaiah 66. Faithful Jerusalem is the daughter of Zion. Zion is a type of the Catholic Church and from this Holy Mother the Church, the faithful nurse like infant children. In the Introit, we are called to rejoice and find comfort at the breasts of Zion.

Notably, in the Latin missale prior to the Second Vatican Council, the epistle lesson was derived from Galatians 4. In fact, this passage is one of the few passages in the New Testament Vulgate that also uses the Latin word "laetare":
But that Jerusalem, which is above, is free; which is our mother. For it is written: Rejoice {laetare}, thou barren, that bearest not: break forth and cry, thou that travailest not; for many are the children of the desolate, more than of her that hath a husband.
As I noted in my book The Catholic Perspective on Paul, this passage and its surrounding context is key in understanding that Paul comprehended the true Church as a "Mother." Paul takes the Old Testament imagery of "Mother Zion" and applies it the true Church. This is a slam dunk for Catholics who find the fulfillment of Israel in the Catholic Church (see The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of Catholic Christianity for more on this topic). Consequently, the traditional Latin prayers and readings for Laetare Sunday are a rich bouquet of Catholic ecclesiology. The Church is the archetype of  "Mother Zion" of the Old Covenant.

The traditional Gospel reading is our Lord's feeding of the 5,000 from St John's Gospel. Why? Christ is in the wilderness and He feeds people miraculously. The theme of feeding at the breast continues here with Christ feeding the hungry mouths of Israel. All humans have experienced hunger and we find that Christ's feeding ministry and the Church's feeding ministry are one and the same. To be fed by Christ is to be fed by the Church.

The true nutrition is not bread alone, but the Word of God.

Of course, all this becomes even more significant when we contemplate how these prayers and readings are smack in the middle of Lent. Lent is a time of fasting - a time of not eating. Yet here in the middle of Lent we are reminded that Christ through our Mother the Church feeds us. The image of a child nursing at the breasts of his mother and that of a miraculous multiplication of loaves should remind us that we have "food to eat, which you know not" (Jn 4:32). The life of penance, fasting, almsgiving, and prayer feeds to the soul and prepares it for the the eternal beatific vision of God in eternity. This vision of God will truly be a feast for our eyes.

Happy Laetare Sunday!

Saint Bernard, one of my favorite saints, was fed from the breast of our Immaculate Mary after he said to her, "Show thyself my mother!" Note the mystical stream of milk entering his mouth...

Πέμπτη 31 Μαρτίου 2011

The significance of the age of 33

Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall

Link to Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall


Why 33 Is the Perfect Age...
Posted: 29 Mar 2011 06:11 PM PDT


The significance of the age of 33:
Christ died at the age of 33.
Saint Joseph was also 33 years old when he took for wife the Virgin Mary, according to visions of Mary Agreda.
Saint Ambrose baptized the to-be Saint Augustine when Augustine was 33 years old. Also, Augustine was a bishop for 33 years.
According to Mary Jane Even, the Virgin Mary would have never changed physical appearance since her 33th year on earth, her beauty being both internal and external.
"Turning Thirty-Three" can be used as a euphemism for dying, as in, "Gramps just turned thirty-three."

Here are other "33 facts":
If you take the numeric value of the word "Amen" in Hebrew, it adds up to 33 (AMEN: 1+13+5+14=33).
There are 33 Doctors of the Church
The Basilica of saint Peter in Rome counts 33 chapels: 29 in the Basilica itself and 4 of more in the crypt.
His Holiness John Paul I reigned as Pope for 33 days.
Each of the three sections of Dante Divine Comedy (Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso) consist of 33 cantos.
Humans are born with 33 vertebrae.

Godspeed,
Taylor

Δευτέρα 28 Μαρτίου 2011

Three Biblical Reasons Fasting and Self-Denial

Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall

Link to Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall


Three Biblical Reasons Fasting and Self-Denial
Posted: 28 Mar 2011 09:16 AM PDT
Every year at the beginning of Lent, I'm encouraged and excited about it. However after a few weeks (like today), I start growing weary of the fasting and penance. So in order to remind myself of why we're keeping Lent, here are more reflections on what Bible teaches about fasting and self-denial:

1. Fasting as a Preparation for a Divine Event
In both the Old Testament and the New Testament, self-denial is a way of preparing spiritually for something spiritually important. Of course, in Lent we are spiritually preparing the the Easter celebration of Christ's resurrection from the dead. Moses fasted for forty days in preparation for receiving the Ten Commandments (Ex 34:28). The prophet Daniel fasted for three weeks before receiving his vision (Dan 10:2-6). Elijah the prophet fasted forty days before God spoke to him (1 Kings 19:8). And we all know that Christ our Savior fasted for forty days in preparation for His temptation by the devil and for the beginning of His ministry (Mt 4:1-11, Lk 4:1-13).

2. Fasting as Penitence
A few weeks ago we looked at the Bible verses for penitence or repentance. The fact is that we are sinners. Self-denial, then, has a twofold purpose. First, penance is a outward sign of an inward contrition. We outwardly express to God our inward sorrow for sin.

Secondly, penance or self-sacrifice is a remedy for future sin. If you teach yourself to say "no" to good things (meat, desserts, comforts, marital pleasure) then you strengthen your will to resist bad things (sin). For example, you're not going to be able to rescue someone pinned under a car (a bad thing) if you don't daily lift weights and build muscle (a good thing).

The concept of penance or self-sacrifice is all over the Bible. Jonah prophesied the destruction of pagan Nineveh, but the Ninevites fasted as a sign of repentance and God spared them (Jonah 3:3-9). The Jewish Day of Atonement was an annual day of obligation of fasting for all Hebrews (Numbers 29:7). In fact, whenever Israel sinned, they "humbled themselves," wore sackcloth, put on ashes, and fasted in order to show God their sorrow for sin (cf. Judges 20:26, 1 Sam 7:6).

3. Fasting for Sorrow
In the Bible, sometimes fasting simply shows sorrow. When tragic things happen, we sometimes lose our appetite naturally. This human experience is also found in Scripture. King David fasted as a sign of grief when Abner was killed (2 Samuel 3:35). There was also a seven-day fast at the death of Saul (1 Samuel 31:13). During Holy Week, and especially on Good Friday, we should be fasting for sorrow, because the "Bridegroom has been taken away from us" (cf. (Matthew 9:14-15; Mark 2:18-20; Luke 5:33-35).

So keep up your penance and reflect on Christ as the Crucified One in order to find strength. We can do all things through Christ who strengthens us! We're almost half way through Lent.

Τρίτη 1 Φεβρουαρίου 2011

Canterbury Tales by Taylor Marshall Deacons, Chalices, and the Mystery of Faith

Deacons, Chalices, and the Mystery of Faith


Saint Stephen, the First Deacon

There has been lots of talk lately about deacons and celibacy based on the recent conclusions made by canon lawyer Ed Peters.

Somewhat related to this is the liturgical function and symbolism of deacons - especially their roles as holders and guardians of the sacred chalice. The Catholic Church has traditionally seen deacons as necessarily chaste and continent because they touch the sacred chalice. I would like to argue that the sacred chalice is itself "the mystery of faith" and this has become forgotten in modern liturgics.

One difficulty in the post-Vatican 2 liturgy, now recognized by many liturgists, was the divorce of the "mysterium fidei" from the words of consecration in the missal of His Holiness Pope Paul VI. Prior to 1970, the consecration of the chalice was as such:

Hic est enim calix sanguinis mei,
novi et aeterni testamenti:
mysterium fidei:
qui pro vobis et pro multis effundetur
in remissionem peccatorum.

This is the chalice of my Blood
of the New and Eternal Testament
the Mystery of Faith
which is poured out for you and for many
for the remission of sins.

The place of "mysterium fidei" in the consecration of the chalice goes back to the 600s at least. Saint Thomas Aquinas taught that the words "mysterium fidei" should be preserved in the consecration of the chalice, just after the word "testimenti" (cf. STh III, q. 78, a. 3; Super I Cor, c. 11, v. 25).

By the way, nobody here (especially not I) claims that the consecration is invalid without "mysterium fidei." Of course, all Novus Ordo Masses are valid. Eastern Eucharists are also valid, even though they also lack what the words "mystery of faith" or τὸ μυστήριον τῆς πίστεως. We're just talking about liturgy and tradition here, not sacramental validity.

The phrase "mystery of faith" was not supposed to be an opportunity to recite an affirmation of the Faith (e.g. "Christ has died, Christ is risen, Christ will come again.")

Previously, the "mystery of faith" is the chalice of the Precious Blood itself which is the New and Everlasting Covenant of Christ. It's the Blood of Christ in particular that is our "mystery of faith" - not words that we recite.

Notably, the only time the phrase "mystery of faith" (Vulgate: mysterium fidei, Greek: τὸ μυστήριον τῆς πίστεως) appears in the pages of Sacred Scripture is at 1 Timothy 3:8-9:
"Deacons in like manner: chaste, not double tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre: Holding the Mystery of Faith in a pure conscience."
Deacons in all rites and traditions, East and West, are associated with the chalice in the liturgy. Deacons literally "hold the Mystery of Faith" at the minor elevation of the Holy Mass. Whether or not Saint Paul intended to denote the Eucharistic chalice by the words "mystery of faith" in 1 Tim 3:8-9, I suspect that the subsequent tradition had a gut feeling that deacons, the mystery of faith, and the chalice go together as an intact unity.

I would also add that the idea of "mystery and chalice" is again reaffirmed in the Apocalypse where we discover that the "false church," that scarlet harlot, also holds a chalice and she is herself a blasphemous "mystery."
"And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden chalice in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication. And on her forehead a name was written: A Mystery: Babylon the Great, the mother of the fornications and the abominations of the earth. ” (Revelation 17:4–5, D-R)
So there seems to be something mysterious about chalices and "mystery" in Scripture.

There is ancient wisdom here.